Week 4 - Mary Moua
(Len Dong spirit ritual in Hanoi)
Materialism vs. Spirituality
In
“‘We Have Len Dong too’: Transnational Aspects of Spirit Possession”, Karen
Fjelstad describes her accounts and interactions with Vietnamese spirit mediums
and their transnational experiences with spirit possession ceremonies and
rituals. In addition to reading about the history behind Len Dong, its
different uses and purposes, and how it serves as a resource to those who
practice it, I thought it was interesting to read about how there are tensions
between various spirit mediums on the issue of materiality versus spirituality.
In the reading, Fjelstad notes that material goods and resources are necessary
for the performance and maintenance of possession ceremonies and rituals, but
an increasing use of material goods brings up the question of whether too many
material goods leads to a distraction of materialism. This is especially
interesting to me because you would think that spirit mediums would
independently perform their own possession ceremonies and rituals without
caring about how others perform or practice their rituals, but there’s this
tension and competition that exists between spirit mediums so it’s especially
interesting to know that they’re not always in solidarity. It brings up the
question of why are they competing in the first place and what will they
necessarily gain from this competition? Why are they trying to outcompete one
another? Furthermore, in relation to the question about materialism versus
spirituality, who gets to determine what counts as materialism and what
doesn’t? Aren’t rituals supposed to have materials? Do you only need the
minimum requirement of materials needed for these rituals or is anything more
than the minimum requirements what is considered materialism? Is it a negative
thing to have too many materials for rituals? I assume that spirit mediums
practice ceremonies and rituals individually and independently so competition
and tension among spirit mediums is unnecessary to some extent. However,
reading Fjelstad’s article proves otherwise and with the relaxed U.S.-Vietnam
trade relations, it’s easier for ritual goods and materials to be transported
between both countries which once again only perpetuates this issue of
materialism versus spirituality and how much is too much.
Source:
Fjelstad, Karen. "‘We have len dong too’: Transnational Aspects of Spirit Possession." Possessed by the spirits: Mediumship in contemporary Vietnamese communities (2006): 95-110.
Comments
Post a Comment