Week 9 - Shannon Trinh
I really like the idea of connectedness and its importance to
spirituality: “connection conceived in indigenous spirituality, as vital and
inherent to its being: a connection to all aspects of the self, connection to
one’s community, connection to history, and connection to a higher power or
larger framework” (151). What was really refreshing about this reading was the
variety of connections we can make in this world – that we do not necessarily
only have to be connected to objects or people that we can physically see or
contact. If we make the effort, we can feel connection with the people who were
here before us (ancestors and past communities who roamed the earth): “This
connection speaks to how the present cannot be theorized without another
dimension; it is never as simple as what you can see. Spirituality is not only
mutually inter-dependent with events in the present but also with history as
symbolized by the lived experiences of the elders and ancestors” (251). With
this being said, I wonder about the psychological effects of various types of
connections. What if those who were more connected to their ancestors and
present communities/environments found more fulfillment, clarity, and happiness
in their lives compared to those who only found connections only with beings in
the present?
This quote was also extremely important: “everything we do is
either in compliance or resistance to dominant discourses, and consequently,
how we perceive spirituality is an important form of resistance…In choosing an
indigenous spirituality of connectedness, we are creating space for multiple
ways of knowing, for a renewed understanding of the common relationships that
we share, and opportunities to interrogate why we see the world as we do”
(281). How are we supposed to understand one another if we don’t spend time in
spaces that provide opportunities for dialogue and shared experiences?
Psychology studies have shown that shared experiences enhance positivity and a
sense of community. Those who share experiences, good or bad, feel more
strongly and more passionately about the topics and experiences at hand. Additionally,
actually talking to others is completely different from reading about forms of
spirituality in a textbook.
Question: What are the academic and psychological effects of
allowing students to share their lived experiences in the classrooms? Are they
positive or negative? Both?
Works Cited:
Eric Ritskes. “Connected: Indigenous Spirituality
as Resistance in the Classroom.”
Comments
Post a Comment